The Synopsis:
The much hyped Bangalore International Airport (BIA) has been operational for about a week now. For the last 6 months it has been in the thick of news. First the industry captains’ call for infrastructure and connectivity. Inspired, frequent flyers were vocal of their needs. There was a tug-of-war and some people or groups trying to make mileage of this. Without enumerating further, I think I have already made my point. Lack of fore-sight. It is so commonplace for people to operate in silos. It naturally supports minding own’s business. Even professionals do that. Corporates are but run by individuals, and how could they be exceptions? Is this not self-centric? Who pays for this? Siloed approach couldn’t be more telling.
If the citizens’ interests were not represented adequately in the decision making – is this not failure of a system?
Impact:
-
Backlash. There is material impact on the credibility and reliability of the parties involved.
-
Rework. Whichever the agency, there is an extent of rework that costs the exchequer additional funds
-
Business repercussions could include relocation of business infrastructure, or revoke any commitment for newer investment.
-
Cascading impact on employability, real estate price, regional development etc.
Analysis & Recommendations:
What I am worried about is a bigger problem. Not many are learning from this episode. I see a strong need for building a business case about this. Any project of likewise size, scale or impact must be evaluated for a comprehensive ease of use. A civil amenity – complex as that of an airport, or a new residential or commercial facility must as well be reviewed for similar capability. A few aspects that are hence of importance are the following.
- Develop a framework for governance. Ideally it needs to be solidly representated by ’stakeholders’.
- Optionally prepare checklists for different classes of amenities.
- Review the framework, and checklists periodically. Shuffle the team at regular intervals.
- Hold citizen forums and seek/ review feedbacks.
- Benchmark against practices and organizations globally.
- Prepare a robust footprint which is well rounded and addresses not only the object (BIA in case in point) but about the eco-system about it.
- An outlay needs to be in place assuming period of service; for reasons of convenience and practice, it could be 20 years.
- A statutory body with adequate authority be formed and leadership be appointed through a thoroughly professional approach.
Failing to plan is planning to fail; there could be many more examples. But in contemporary India, this is a classic case. A consultant, by profession, I am wondering if this isn’t a rich business case to justify a new tailored practice!


